Crowd Sourcing, Unity, the Good and the Bad
Crowd sourcing really is a double-edged sword, when you
think about it. On the one hand, you have the notion that two heads are better
than one. That certainly often seems to ring true, as the extremes of the
individuals are often cancelled out by the consensus of the masses to reveal a
very accurate answer. Additionally, unity can be incredibly powerful and can
accomplish a lot. However, you could also end up with a groupthink phenomenon
if this group becomes too isolated and begins to play off of one another –
creating a group polarization effect. There could also be room for a large
amount of error considering how (un)reliable eye witness accounts are when you
are trying to consult a large number of people to find out something that
happened and who caused that something. The Boston Marathon bombing is an
example of this. Even with the success of finding the bombers through the use
of crowd sourcing, law enforcement still had to contend with large amounts of
misinformation that they needed to sift through. Especially when the topic is
terrorism, misinformation has the potential to cause destruction of a person’s
life on a massive scale. Crowd sourcing also has the advantage of allowing
people to see that they are not alone, that they can be a part of a much larger
picture. A common goal, especially an emotionally charged common goal, can create
unity among even feuding people. It can open up lines of communication that
were otherwise unachievable. Just as a common goal can create unity for a
positive outcome, it can create unity for a negative outcome. Take the example
of terrorism previously mentioned. Not many things unite people like the fight
against terrorism. Law enforcement are likely to unite tightly in the pursuit
of information leading to bringing a terrorist to justice. This alone could
cloud a person’s judgement. Then you have ordinary citizens also wanting to
join in the crusade. Their well-meaning – wrong – witness accounts could lead
to the pursuit of the wrong suspect. Groupthink could set in among the
officers, they may not be able to see the forest for the trees, and therefore,
end up destroying a poor person’s life as a result. Like all powerful tools,
their use comes with a great responsibility.
Comments
Post a Comment